Evolutionism, Memetics, and Complex Adaptive Systems, or Film Studies in the Face of the Biocultural Turn

Kamila Żyto

kamila.zyto@uni.lodz.pl
University of Lodz (Poland)
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2822-8341

Abstract

Despite the significant impact of the biocultural turn on humanities, film studies only occasionally recognise the intellectual potential of the cognitive perspective of natural science. In particular, the thought of Charles Darwin and his followers seems to have been marginalised. The article outlines the barely recognised theoretical paradigm of evolutionism in film studies. The author describes the areas of film theory echoing evolutionism (e.g. cognitivism), as well as maps out new, heterogeneous fields of research emerging in film studies. These considerations are complemented by a weighing up the pros and cons of memetics, often referred to as Darwinism without biology. Last but not least, the author evokes the concept of complex adaptive systems (CAS) as a potentially useful model in the process of describing not only film texts, but film culture as a whole.


Keywords:

film theory, biocultural turn, evolutionism, memetics, complex adaptive systems

Aldrich, H. E. i in. (2008). In Defence of Generalized Darwinism. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 18 (5), ss. 577-596. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00191-008-0110-z
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-008-0110-z   Google Scholar

Andrews, D., Andrews, C. (2012). Film Studies and the Biocultural Turn. Philosophy and Literature, 36 (1), ss. 58-78.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/phl.2012.0009   Google Scholar

Blackmore, S. (2002). Maszyna memowa (tłum. N. Radomski). Poznań: Dom Wydawniczy „Rebis”.
  Google Scholar

Bordwell, D. (2008). Poetics of Cinema. New York – London: Routledge.
  Google Scholar

Bordwell, D. (2010). What Snakes, Eagles, and Rhesus Macaques Can Teach Us. W: B. Boyd, J. Carroll, J. Gottschall (red.), Evolution, Literature, and Film: A Reader (ss. 270-288). New York: Columbia University Press.
  Google Scholar

Bortolotti, G. R., Hutcheon, L. (2020). O pochodzeniu adaptacji. Biologiczne przemyślenia o dyskursie wierności i „sukcesu” (tłum. M. Pytko). Tekstualia, (1), ss. 9-25.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.1357   Google Scholar

Boyd, B. (2011). O pochodzeniu opowieści. Spojrzenie wstecz i perspektywy: ewolucja, literatura, krytyka (tłum. T. Markiewka). Teksty Drugie, (3), ss. 145-164.
  Google Scholar

Budzicz, Ł. (2010). Naturalistyczny model ewolucji kulturowej. W: Z. Błaszczak, A. Szczuciński (red.), Wokół ewolucjonizmu. Dylematy biologów, filozofów i fizyków (ss. 49-62). Poznań: Oficyna Wydawnicza Batik.
  Google Scholar

Carmichael, T., Hadžikadić, M. (2019). The Fundamentals of Complex Adaptive Systems. W: T. Carmichael, A. J. Collins, M. Hadžikadić (red.), Complex Adaptive Systems: Views from the Physical, Natural, and Social Sciences (ss. 1-16). Cham: Springer International Publisher.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20309-2_1   Google Scholar

Carroll, J. (1995). Evolution and Literary Theory. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02734174   Google Scholar

Carroll, J. (2008). An Evolutionary Paradigm for Literary Study. Style, (2-3), ss. 103-134.
  Google Scholar

Castelfranchi, C. (2001). Towards a Cognitive Memetics: Socio-Cognitive Mechanism for Memes Selection and Spreading. Journal of Memetics: Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission, (5), ss. 1-19. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2740560
  Google Scholar

Creed, B. (2009). Darwin’s Screens: Evolutionary Aesthetics, Time and Sexual Display in the Cinema. Melbourne: Melbourne University Publishing.
  Google Scholar

Dawkins, R. (1996). Samolubny gen (tłum. M. Skoneczny). Warszawa: Prószyński i S-ka.
  Google Scholar

Grodal, T. (2017). How Film Genres Are a Product of Biology, Evolution and Culture: An Embodied Approach. Palgrave Communications, (3), ss. 1-8. https://www.nature.com/articles/palcomms201779.pdf
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2017.79   Google Scholar

Helman, A., Ostaszewski, J. (2007). Historia myśli filmowej. Podręcznik. Gdańsk: słowo/obraz terytoria.
  Google Scholar

Hendrykowski, M. (2015). Metodologia nowej historii filmu. Images, 17 (26), ss. 311-316.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/i.2015.26.29   Google Scholar

Heylighen, F., Chielens, K. (2009). Cultural Evolution and Memetics. W: R. A. Meyers (red.), Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science (ss. 3205-3220). New York: Springer.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30440-3_189   Google Scholar

Hoffman, A. (1997). Wokół ewolucji. Warszawa: Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy.
  Google Scholar

Kowalczyk-Purol, K. (2018). Teoretyczne trudności memetyki. Diametros, (58), ss. 65-86.
  Google Scholar

Mathews, P. D. (2014). The Morality Meme: Nietzsche and „A Serious Man”. Cultura. International Journal of Philosophy of Culture and Axiology, 11 (1), ss. 63-81.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/cultura20141114   Google Scholar

Naremore, J. (2008). More Than Night: Film Noir in Its Contexts. Berkley – Los Angeles – London: University of California Press.
  Google Scholar

Pabiś-Orzeszyna, M. (2014). Nowa Historia Filmu, Nowa Historia Kina. Część druga: rewidowanie rewizjonistów. Ekrany, (1), ss. 55-60.
  Google Scholar

Pabiś-Orzeszyna, M. (2020). Zwrot historyczny w badaniach filmoznawczych. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
  Google Scholar

Smith, I. R. (2017). The Hollywood Meme: Transnational Adaptations in World Cinema. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748677474   Google Scholar

Smith, M. (2017). Film, Art, and the Third Culture: A Naturalized Aesthetics of Film. Oxford – New York: Oxford University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198790648.001.0001   Google Scholar

Wężowicz-Ziółkowska, D., Borkowski, W. (2013). Kultura jako adaptacja. Kultura w paradygmacie przyrodoznawstwa. Biblioteka Postscriptum Polonistycznego, (3), ss. 25-40.
  Google Scholar

Żyto, K. (2017). Film noir i kino braci Coen. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
  Google Scholar


Published
2022-11-02

Cited by

Żyto, K. (2022) “Evolutionism, Memetics, and Complex Adaptive Systems, or Film Studies in the Face of the Biocultural Turn”, Kwartalnik Filmowy, (119), pp. 30–55. doi: 10.36744/kf.1246.

Authors

Kamila Żyto 
kamila.zyto@uni.lodz.pl
University of Lodz Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2822-8341

She holds an MA in Cultural Studies and a PhD in Humanities from the University of Lodz. Currently she works as a Professor in the Department of Media and Audiovisual Arts at the University of Lodz, Poland. Since 2012, she has collaborated with the Academy of Music as a lecturer in film studies. She has been active in many education projects, such as the School Film Library and the Academy of Polish Film, run by the Polish Film Institute. She writes film reviews for professional film magazines, such as Film & TV Kamera and Ekrany. She regularly participates as a member of the jury in “Camera Action”, a festival for young film critics. In 2010 she published Strategie labiryntowe w filmie fikcji [Maze Structure as a Strategy in the Fiction Film] and co-edited three other books. Her publications include numerous articles on film noir, Polish and Spanish film history, images of Jews in Polish cinema. She is a member of the Polish Society for Film and Media Studies.



Statistics

Abstract views: 362
PDF downloads: 320


License

Copyright (c) 2022 Kamila Żyto

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

The author grants the publisher a royalty-free non-exclusive licence (CC BY 4.0) to use the article in Kwartalnik Filmowy, retains full copyright, and agrees to identify the work as first having been published in Kwartalnik Filmowy should it be published or used again (download licence agreement). The journal is published under the CC BY 4.0 licence. By submitting an article, the author agrees to make it available under this licence.

In issues from 105-106 (2019) to 119 (2022) all articles were published under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 licence. During this period the authors granted a royalty-free non-exclusive licence (CC BY-ND 4.0) to use their article in „Kwartalnik Filmowy”, retained full copyright, and agreed to identify the work as first having been published in our journal should it be published or used again.