The Object-oriented Cinema

Andrzej Marzec

martius@amu.edu.pl
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan (Poland)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9259-2642

Abstract

The author investigates the recent phenomenon of object-oriented cinema. Interpreting the films of Quentin Dupieux and Peter Strickland, he focuses primarily on the key category of speculative realism that is allure, and distinguishes it from sensual seduction, which is most often confused with. Then, referring to the Jane Bennett theory of vitalist materialism and her concept of thing-power, he asks about the agency of objects and why it is so difficult for us to imagine it. He presents the passive-active nature of agency of Bennett on the example of the latest film by James Benning, Maggie’s Farm (2019). The author proves that aesthetics and rhetoric in object-oriented cinema are not superficial ornaments, but on the contrary allow individual filmmakers to look at objects in a different way.


Keywords:

object-oriented ontology, speculative realism, allure, weird realism, contemporary cinema

Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things, Durham – London: Duke University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822391623   Google Scholar

Chen, M. Y. (2012). Animacies: Biopolitics, Racial Mattering, and Queer Affect. Durham – London: Duke University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822395447   Google Scholar

Faber, R. Goffey, A. (red.) (2014). The Allure of Things: Process and Object in Contemporary Philosophy. London – New York: Bloomsbury.
  Google Scholar

Harman, G. (2005). Guerrilla Metaphysics: Phenomenology and the Carpentry of Things. chicacg: Open Court.
  Google Scholar

Harman, G. (2007). Aesthetics as First Philosophy: Levinas and the Non-Human. Naked Punch, 9, ss. 21-30.
  Google Scholar

Harman, G. (2008). On the Horror of Phenomenology: Lovecraft and Husserl. Collapse, 4.
  Google Scholar

Harman, G. (2012). O przyczynowości zastępczej (tłum. M. Rychter). Kronos, 1.
  Google Scholar

Harman, G. (2012). Weird Realism: Lovecraft and Philosophy. Winchester – Washington: Zero Book.
  Google Scholar

Harman, G. (2013). Traktat o przedmiotach (tłum. M. Rychter). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  Google Scholar

Harman, G. (2017). Object-Oriented Ontology: A New Theory of Everything. London: Penguin Random House UK.
  Google Scholar

Harman, G. (2020). Art and Objects. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  Google Scholar

Kafka, F. (2016) Troska ojca rodziny. W: Opowieści i przypowieści (tłum. E. Ptaszyńska-Sadowska). Warszawa: PIW.
  Google Scholar

Kristeva, J. (2007). Potęga obrzydzenia. Esej o wstręcie (tłum M. Falski). Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
  Google Scholar

Latour, B. (2013). Nadzieja Pandory. Eseje o rzeczywistości w studiach nad nauką (tłum. K. Abriszewski). Toruń: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika.
  Google Scholar

Mitchell, W. J. T. (2013). Czego chcą obrazy? Pragnienia przedstawień, życie i miłości obrazów (tłum. Ł. Zaręba). Warszawa: Narodowe Centrum Kultury.
  Google Scholar

Morton, T. (2013). Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology after the End of the World. Minneapolis – London: University of Minnesota Press.
  Google Scholar

Morton, T. (2013). Realist Magic: Objects, Ontology, Causality. Ann Arbor: Open Humanities Press.
  Google Scholar

Prus, B. (1976). Kamizelka. W: Nowele wybrane. Warszawa: PIW.
  Google Scholar

Wilkoszewska, K. (1993). Paula Virilio filozofia prędkości i estetyka znikania. Kultura Współczesna, (1), ss. 108-113.
  Google Scholar

Wilkoszewska, K. (2000). Wariacje na postmodernizm. Kraków: Towarzystwo Autorów i Wydawców Prac Naukowych „Universitas”.
  Google Scholar

Žižek, S. (2003). Patrząc z ukosa. Do Lacana poprzez kulturę popularną (tłum. J. Margański). Warszawa: KR.
  Google Scholar


Published
2020-08-26

Cited by

Marzec, A. (2020) “The Object-oriented Cinema”, Kwartalnik Filmowy, (110), pp. 80–99. doi: 10.36744/kf.340.

Authors

Andrzej Marzec 
martius@amu.edu.pl
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9259-2642

PhD, philosopher, film critic, editor of Czas Kultury journal, vloger of Widma Marca. His research interests focus on object-oriented ontology, post-digital aesthetics and contemporary alternative cinema. The author of the book Widmontologia. Teoria filozoficzna i praktyka artystyczna ponowoczesności [Hauntology: The Philosophical Theories and Artistic Practices of Postmodernity] (2015). He is trying to find the answer to the question, why the contemporary culture is so nostalgic and he is unable to free himself from remembering his past. He is attracted to visual arts, experimental cinema and a vision of ecology that one can think about without using the concept of “nature”.



Statistics

Abstract views: 386
PDF downloads: 308


License

Copyright (c) 2020 Andrzej Marzec

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

The author grants the publisher a royalty-free non-exclusive licence (CC BY 4.0) to use the article in Kwartalnik Filmowy, retains full copyright, and agrees to identify the work as first having been published in Kwartalnik Filmowy should it be published or used again (download licence agreement). The journal is published under the CC BY 4.0 licence. By submitting an article, the author agrees to make it available under this licence.

In issues from 105-106 (2019) to 119 (2022) all articles were published under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 licence. During this period the authors granted a royalty-free non-exclusive licence (CC BY-ND 4.0) to use their article in „Kwartalnik Filmowy”, retained full copyright, and agreed to identify the work as first having been published in our journal should it be published or used again.